Method of pre-project selection of components for fpv uavs the quadropter type according to the set values of thrust, speed and flight time

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-6761-2024-1-4

Keywords:

unmanned aerial vehicle, components, automated design, flight controller, engine, electronic speed controller

Abstract

Purpose. Develop a methodology for the pre-project selection of quadcopter-type UAV components for the creation of drones based on the specified criteria.

Methodology. Mathematical analysis and modeling.

Findings. The paper presents a comprehensive framework aimed at facilitating the rapid assembly of customizable multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles (MR-UAVs) tailored to specific mission requirements, all without the need for tools. This modular approach encompasses the development, implementation, and evaluation of a structured process that guides operators through selecting hardware components such as sensors, actuators, propellers, motors, batteries, and electronic speed controllers. This meticulous selection process is pivotal in achieving the desired flight characteristics of the MR-UAV. Furthermore, a software tool has been devised to streamline the equipment selection process and accurately compute flight time. The flight time calculation algorithm, rooted in data obtained from brushless motor and propeller analyses conducted using a traction stand/dynamometer, has undergone rigorous testing to ensure reliability and precision. The framework itself comprises five distinct modules: controller, transmission, video, communication, and payload. These modular components afford users the flexibility to mix and match according to the demands of their specific application, enabling the swift assembly of an MR-UAV optimized for the task at hand. To validate the efficacy of the framework, a prototype was constructed and subjected to rigorous testing, confirming the soundness of the design. Notably, the versatility of this framework is exemplified through the creation of three distinct modular MR-UAV profiles. These profiles cater to diverse applications: surveillance, emphasizing extended flight time; delivery, prioritizing larger payload capacity; and a hybrid configuration allowing seamless transition between battery power sources mid-flight. In essence, this paper not only introduces a modular framework for MR-UAV assembly but also underscores its practicality and adaptability through real-world implementation and testing across varied mission profiles.

Originality.  For this section of the abstract should determining the most important results that reflect originality of work. The algorithm proposed in the article is based on an approach that allows adapting MR-UAVs at a higher level than previous systems. The infrastructure allows the user to configure flight characteristics (flight time, speed, maximum payload), as well as sensors and communication channels (video and data link) according to the requirements of a specific operation.

Practical value. To facilitate the process of selecting hardware components for frame modules, the paper presents an algorithm for estimating flight time, which is included in the process of building modular profiles. The algorithm has been tested and an average accuracy of 98.94% has been achieved for hover time-of-flight estimation. The design of the software is presented. This tool allows developers to analyze brushless motor and propeller data (obtained from the thrust stand), evaluate how gross weight and battery selection affect the MR-UAV (in terms of flight time, thrust-to-weight ratio, and maximum payload), and optimizes the process development of MR-UAV.

Author Biographies

O. Yu. Malyi, National University "Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic"

Ph.D, Associate professor, acting head of information technologies of electronic devices department of the Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University, Zaporizhzhia

I.Ye. Pospeieva, National University "Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic"

Senior lecturer of information technologies of electronic devices department of the Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University, Zaporizhzhia

N.I. Furmanova, National University "Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic"

Ph.D, Associate professor, dean of faculty of information security and electronic communications of the Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University, Zaporizhzhia

V.F. Onyshchenko, National University "Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic"

Ph.D, Associate professor of information technologies of electronic devices department of the Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University, Zaporizhzhia

M.Yu. Zaluzhnyi, National University "Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic"

Senior lecturer of electric drive and commercial plant automation department of the Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University, Zaporizhzhia

V.V. Ivanov, Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University

master degree student of the Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic National University, Zaporizhzhia

References

Allenspach, M., Bodie, K., Brunner, M., Rinsoz, L., Taylor, Z., Kamel, M., ... & Nieto, J. (2020). Design and optimal control of a tiltrotor micro-aerial vehicle for effi-cient omnidirectional flight. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 39(10-11), 1305-1325.

Anzai, T., Zhao, M., Chen, X., Shi, F., Kawasaki, K., Okada, K., & Inaba, M. (2017, September). Mul-tilinked multirotor with internal communication sys-tem for multiple objects transportation based on form optimization method. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ Inter-national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Sys-tems (IROS), 5977-5984.

Badr, S., Mehrez, O., & Kabeel, A. E. (2016, June). A novel modification for a quadrotor design. In 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 702-710.

Barber, C. B., Dobkin, D. P., & Huhdanpaa, H. (1996). The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 22(4), 469-483.

Blouin, C., & Lanteigne, E. (2014, May). Pitch control of an oblique active tilting bi-rotor. In 2014 Interna-tional Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 791-799.

Bouabdallah, S., Noth, A., and Siegwart, R. (2004) PID vs LQ control techniques applied to an indoor micro quadrotor. In: 2004 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelli-gent Robots and Systems. Sendai, Japan, 2451–2456.

Brescianini, D., & D'Andrea, R. (2016, May). Design, modeling and control of an omni-directional aerial vehicle. In 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 3261-3266.

Bronz, M., Smeur, E. J., Garcia de Marina, H., & Hat-tenberger, G. (2017). Development of a fixed-wing mini UAV with transitioning flight capability. In 35th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, 3739.

De Martini, D., Gramazio, G. V., Bertini, A., Rotten-bacher, C., & Facchinetti, T. (2017). Design and modeling of a quadcopter with double axis tilting ro-tors. Unmanned Systems, 5(03), 169-180.

Devlin, T., Dickerhoff, R., Durney, K., Forrest, A., Pansodtee, P., Adabi, A., & Teodorescu, M. (2018). Elbowquad: Thrust vectoring quadcopter. In 2018 AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech@ Aero-space, 0893.

Haus, T., Orsag, M., & Bogdan, S. (2017, June). A concept of a non-tilting multirotor-UAV based on moving mass control. In 2017 International Confer-ence on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 1618-1624.

Donadel, R., Raffo, G. V., & Becker, L. B. (2014). Modeling and control of a tiltrotor UAV for path tracking. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 47(3), 3839-3844.

Franchi, A., Carli, R., Bicego, D., & Ryll, M. (2018). Full-pose tracking control for aerial robotic systems with laterally bounded input force. IEEE Transac-tions on Robotics, 34(2), 534-541.

Fu, Z., Xiao, B., Yang, J., Wu, C., & Wei, Y. (2017, July). Modeling and control of a new multicopter. In 2017 36th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), 6495-6500.

Akopov, M., Maksymova, S., & Yevsieiev, V. (2023). Choosing a Camera for 3D Map-ping. Journal of Universal Science Research, 1(11), 28-38.

Hamandi, M., Sawant, K., Tognon, M., & Franchi, A. (2020, September). Omni-plus-seven (O7+): An om-nidirectional aerial prototype with a minimal number of unidirectional thrusters. In 2020 International conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), 754-761.

Malyi, O., Furmanova, N., Onyshhenko, V., Malyi S. Metodologichni zasady vyboru komponentiv rushijnoi' ustanovky multyrotornyh BPLA (2023). Vyrobnyctvo & Mehatronni Systemy, 158-162

Jiang, G., Voyles, R., Sebesta, K., & Greiner, H. (2017, September). Estimation and optimization of fully-actuated multirotor platform with nonparallel actuation mechanism. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ Interna-tional Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 6843-6848.

Published

2024-06-26

How to Cite

Malyi, O. Y., Pospeieva, I., Furmanova, N., Onyshchenko, V., Zaluzhnyi, M., & Ivanov, V. (2024). Method of pre-project selection of components for fpv uavs the quadropter type according to the set values of thrust, speed and flight time. Electrical Engineering and Power Engineering, (1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-6761-2024-1-4

Issue

Section

Automation and computer-integrated technologies