Research of energy expenditures for mechanical mixing of raw materials in a biogas reactor

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-6761-2025-2-2

Keywords:

Reynolds criterion, comparative analysis, energy efficiency, Euler's criterion, mechanical mixing, electric motor power, energy consumption

Abstract

Purpose. Study of energy consumption by mechanical mixers and selection of an energy-efficient mixing device to ensure reduction of energy consumption for the biogas production process and increase interest in its further processing into other types of energy.

Methodology. Comparative analysis and use of mathematical modeling methods to determine the amount of energy consumed for mixing, generalization of the results obtained.

Findings. The formation of the energy system consists in including renewable alternative energy systems, including biogas technologies. The energy efficiency of which depends on the amount of energy consumed for the processes of intensification of the fermentation of raw materials. One of the main means of intensification is careful and frequent mixing of raw materials during fermentation. The presence of various types of devices for mixing substances in reactors confirms the relevance of the issue of developing energy-efficient means to accelerate fermentation and increase the profitability of further actions with biogas and its processing. The most rational ways to increase the energy efficiency of mixing are to establish the dependences of energy consumption by mechanical mixing devices, to choose a rational type of mixer, which includes the search for rational mass-dimensional characteristics that ensure uniform flows of raw materials in the biogas reactor and at the same time spend the least amount of energy for mixing. Performing the above actions ensures the determination of rational mass-dimensional characteristics of the mixer, which significantly reduces energy consumption for mixing and increases the profitability of implementing biogas technologies into the energy system.

Originality. The types of electric machines used as electric drives of mixing devices are analyzed. Taking into account the control systems of electric drives and the cycle diagrams of their operation, as well as the features of mixing the substance, the change in the Euler hydrodynamic similarity criterion for different types of mechanical mixers with the same geometric parameters of biogas reactors, the levels of organic raw materials and the same speed mode of movement of the working body of the mixer, the power consumption for the technological process – mixing is established. A comparative analysis of the influence of the type and geometric dimensions of mechanical mixers on the energy consumption for mixing the volume of the substance in a closed tank when using a single-phase asynchronous motor as a mixer drive is carried out. Using a polynomial dependence, an equation was obtained that describes the change in the power of the electric drive from the change in the frequency of rotation of the working body of a two-tier mixer in which the blades are installed at an angle of 900.

Practical value. The results presented in the work can be used to increase the energy efficiency of biogas plants. The direction of further research on the consumption of reactive power by electric motors during the technological cycle of the mixer operation has been established, which will allow determining the pattern of changes in reactive power consumption and outlining the directions of movement towards its reduction.

Author Biographies

M.O. Spodoba, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D), Assistant, Department of Electrical Engineering, Electromechanics and Electrotechnology, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

O.O. Spodoba, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D), Senior lecturer, Department of Design of Machines and Equipment, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

References

WBA. Global Potential of Biogas; World Biogas Asso-ciation: London, UK, 2019.

EBA. EBA Statistical Report 2023; European Biogas Association: Brussels, Belgium, 2023.

Ward, A.J., Hobbs, P.J., Holliman, P.J., Jones, D.L. (2008). Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 7928-7940.

Ratushnyak, G.S., Lyalyuk, O.G., Koshcheev, І.A. (2017) Bіogazovі ustanovki z vіdnovlyuvanimi dzherelami energії termostabіlіzatsії protsesu fer-mentatsії bіomasi. Vіnnitsya: VNTU, 88.

Marks, S., Dach, J., Fernandez Morales, F.J., Mazurkiewicz, J., Pochwatka, P., Gierz, Ł. (2020). New Trends in Substrates and Biogas Systems in Po-land. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 21, 4, 19-25.

Balussou D. McKenna R., Möst D. Fichtner W. A model-based analysis of the future capacity expan-sion for German biogas plants under different legal frameworks. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, no. 96, pp. 119–131.

Holub S., Shinkaruk N. Principles of legal regulation of bioenergy use in the European Union. Law. Human. Environment, Kyiv, 2021, 12(4), pp. 72-77.

Zablodskiy M., Spodoba M., Spodoba O. (2022). Ex-perimental study of energy losses of a biogas reactor to the environment in the mesophilic mode of fer-mentation. Energy and automation, 2, 18-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/energiya2022.02.018

M. Zablodskiy, M. Spodoba, О. Spodoba. "Experi-mental investigation of energy consumption for the process of initial heating of a substrate for the use of electric heat-mechanical system." Electrical Engi-neering and Power Engineering, №1, 2022, рр. 49–59.

Zablodskiy M.M., Spodoba M.O. Rationale for creat-ing an electrothermomechanical system for mixing and heating biomass. Energy and Automation, Kyiv, no. 5, pp. 136-148, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31548/energiya2020.05.136

Foukrach, M., Bouzit, M., Ameur, H. (2020). Effect of Agitator’s Types on the Hydrodynamic Flow in an Agitated Tank. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 33, 37.

Chervoniy, І.F., Kurіs, Yu.V. (2012) Doslіdzhennya pristroїv ta udoskonalennya protsesіv peremіshu-vannya v bіogazovikh ustanovkakh. Kh.: Energos-berezheniye. Energetika. Energoaudit. 2, 96.

Kurіs, Yu.V. Bіoyenergetichnі ustanovki. Oblad-nannya ta tekhnologії pererobki organovmіsnikh energoresursіv. Zaporіzhzhya: ZDІA, 348.

M. Spodoba and O. Spodoba, "Mathematical Model of Changes in Energy Costs for Thermostabilization of the Substrate and Objects in a Biogas Reactor," 2023 IEEE 5th International Conference on Modern Electrical and Energy System (MEES), Kremenchuk, Ukraine, 2023, pp. 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1109/MEES61502.2023.10402431

D. Deublein and A. Steinhauser, "Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources. An Introduction" in, Weinheim:KGaA, pp. 450, 2008.

Ratushnyak, G.S., Anokhіna, K.V., Dzhedzhula, V.V. (2010) Doslіdzhennya parametrіv protsesu peremіshuvannya organіchnoї masi v bіogazovіy ustanovtsі z vertikalnim propelernim peremіshu-vachem. Vіnnitsya: VNTU, 170.

Spodoba, M.O., Zablodskiy, N.N., Radko, І.P. (2019) Osnovnі skladovі metodologії pobudovi zaglibnogo elektromekhanіchnogo peretvoryuvacha dlya bіogazovikh kompleksіv. V Mіzhnarodna naukovo-praktichna konferentsіya prisvyachena pam’yatі profesora Vіktora Mikhaylovicha Sinkova «Problemi ta perspektivi rozvitku energetiki. el-ektrotekhnologіy ta avtomatiki v APK». K.: NUBіP.

Marks, S., Jeżowska, A., Kozłowski, K., Dach, J., Wilk, B., Fudala-Książek, S. (2017). Review of mix-ing systems of fermentation liquid used in biogas plants. Technika Rolnicza Ogrodnicza Leśna, 6, 24-26.

Zakomorniy, D.M., Povodzinskiy, V.M., Shibetskiy, V.Yu. (2015) Klasifіkatsіya ta analіz roboti fer-menterіv z mekhanіchnimi peremіshuyuchimi pris-troyami v ayerobnikh protsesakh bіotekhnologії. ScienceRise, 5 (2), 24-32.

Lunyaka, K., Vus, D., Chumakov, G. (2008) Doslіdzhennya masoperedachі pri peremіshuvannі turbіnnoyu mіshalkoyu v posudinakh z vіdbivnimi peregorodkami. Ternopil: Vіsnik Ternopіlskogo derzhavnogo tekhnіchnogo unіversitetu, 13,171-176.

Ameur, H. (2016). Mixing of complex fluids with flat and pitched bladed impellers: effect of blade attack angle and shear-thinning behavior. Food Bioprod. Process. 99, 71-77.

Ameur, H. (2018). Modifications in the Rushton tur-bine for mixing viscoplastic fluids. J. Food Eng. 223, 117-125.

M. Zablodskiy and M. Spodoba, "Determination of energy efficient level of the speed of mixing body of electromechanical system", Kremenchuk: Electro-mechanical and energy saving systems, vol. 4, no. 52, pp. 17-26, 2020.http://dx.doi.org/10.30929/2072-2052.2020.4.52.17-26

Lunyaka K.V., Vus D.N., Rusanov S.A., Klyuyev O.I. (2009) Rozchinennya tverdoї rechovini pri peremіshuvannі mіshalkami v posudinakh z vertikalnimi peregorodkami. Kherson, 36-39.

Kvitka S.O., Bezmennikova L.M., Vovk O.Yu., Kvitka O.S. Control methods and hardware implementation of modern frequency converters. Proceedings of the Tavria State Agrotechnological University: scientific professional publication. Melitopol: TGATU, 2013. Issue 3, vol. 2. P. 164-171.

Peresada S.M., Kovbasa, S.M., Dymko, S.S., Blagodir, V.O. Comparative analysis of energy efficiency of algorithms for direct vector torque control of asynchronous motors with maximization of the torque-current ratio. Technical Electrodynamics. 2015. No. 4. P. 36-40. Access mode: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/TED_2015_4_8.

A. G. Skliar, R. V. Skliar (2019). Analysis of methods and means for mixing the substrate in the methane kit of biogas plants. Machinery & Energetics, 10(4), 19-26.

Spodoba M. Zablodskiy M. Dependence of energy costs on the type of mechanical stirrer used in a bio-gas reactor. Electrical engineering and power engi-neering, 2021, (1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-6761-2021-1-3

Cherevko, O.І., Poperechniy, A.M. (2014) Protsesi і aparati kharchovikh virobnitstv: pіdruchnik 2-e vidannya. dop. ta vipr. Kh.: Svіt Knig, 495

Published

2025-06-14

How to Cite

Spodoba, M., & Spodoba, O. (2025). Research of energy expenditures for mechanical mixing of raw materials in a biogas reactor. Electrical Engineering and Power Engineering, (2), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.15588/1607-6761-2025-2-2